Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTiwari, G N
dc.contributor.authorUpadhyay, M
dc.contributor.authorRai, S N
dc.date.accessioned2007-01-17T03:46:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-10T12:58:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-11T06:23:22Z
dc.date.available2007-01-17T03:46:26Z
dc.date.available2019-02-10T12:58:47Z
dc.date.available2019-02-11T06:23:22Z
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.citationBuilding and Environment, 29(1), 21-31p.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/iit/handle/2074/2445
dc.description.abstractA comparison of passive cooling techniques of a non-airconditioned apartment for Delhi climate condition has been presented. The various cooling techniques namely, evaporative cooling, movable canvas, roof gardens, shading effect and air cavity in walls etc. have been incorporated in the thermal analysis. Numerical computations were carried out for Delhi climatic conditions and it is inferred that 1. (i) the evaporative cooling is the best option to reduce the incoming heat flux through the roof if the water is easily available, and 2. (ii) the air cavity also reduces the incoming flux entering through walls.en
dc.format.extent276995 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectevaporative coolingen
dc.subjectmovable canvasen
dc.subjectshading effecten
dc.subjectair cavityen
dc.subjectheat fluxen
dc.subjectincoming fluxen
dc.titleA comparison of passive cooling techniquesen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record